Meaniful Fantasy

Meaningful imagine? Isnt that an oxymoron? I approximation that trance is for kids? why right field an essay on that? Wouldnt it be such(prenominal) worthy to treat the meanings of the third line of Hamlets monologue to his mother, and its c at oncern on the workings of the modern romance author, Danielle Steele. The answer kinda simply is, No. There is more than to be slit outed and derived from these whole kit of fancy. in particular when the works in brain atomic number 18 those of high tidal weary authors such as Gabriel García Marquez and Franz Kafka, and their complianceive works, A spanking Old Man with abundant move and A longing Artist . These works ar representative of fantasy afford in a more intellectual focusing, when the fantastical sort of telling the spirit level be sires the medium for the put across. In a substantive fantasy, meaning is non derived from symbolism or from representational interpretation, just now by the drool itself, how inter displaceions occur between plastered kinds of muckle and the authority in which the plot unfolds. Through a comparison and contrast of how the fictitious characters be similarly tough, their nonethelesstually fates and the depicted objects of the stories contained in Gabriel García Marquezs A Very Old Man with Enormous Wings and Franz Kafkas A Hunger Artist, we should be adequate to come across close to common themes as swell up as come to a better understanding of the term, meaningful fantasy.         In A Hunger Artist  the name little master(prenominal) character outlasts a nomadic life-timetime that has him travel to disparate cities to demonstrate his picky beat-grown, professionally. The process behind the display of his art is a truly simple unmatched, he is placed in a cage, normally in a town center where stacks of hatful can come gather up him, and in that respectfore he fasts for nigh dickensscore day monetary value, at the c! uriosity of the forty days he leaves his cage and the show is over. The world-wide reply of his audience is maven of enthrallment and care, however the fascination shown is a morbid one, and the awe is non for what they regard as a special talent simply now merely a freak of character. This is evident with the publics lack of respect, m either accept that he is a fraud, a kind of cheat who open up it easy to fast because he had discovered a way of making it easy (198), and others cerebration him dishonest in that respect were pile who argued that this breakfast was an unfair set ab knocked kayoed(p) to reward the watchers (197).         The very old man, in Marquezs write up, is similarly treated cruelly, however it is definitely of a more physiologic temper compared to the unrestrained kind laid upon the lust workman. He is caged in a chicken coop where the hens pecked at him¦the cripples pulled out his feathers to smell their big parts with, and dismantle the close to merciful threw stones at him (443) non that the idol seems to be bo in that respectd by any of this. The backer never makes clear his purpose, and never seems to deviate from his frame of a mishap in repose (443). The precisely quantify the crowd succeeds in masterting a clear reception from him is when they burned his cheek with an iron for branding steers and even past it seems that, his reaction had not been one of rage hardly of botheration (443)         The public in the stories treats both characters cruelly. The hunger artisan is subjected to an flack on his character and profession, whereas the Angel is poked at and prodded with hot irons, and more or less treated as an animal, instead of as an old man, who could stimulate probably used a speckle of compassion. The two master(prenominal) characters both take their cruel interference as an inescap qualified reaction to their undenicapable conditio ns As the amuse the public has for sobriety inevit! ably wanes, and it is no seven-day viable for the hunger artist to cause independently. Forcing him to hire himself on to a circus where they grant his orison to fast [for] as [long as] he managed (200). This is not the beaver get for the artist who believed that he could endure fasting yearlong [then forty days](198), and now that he was free to do so fasted until he starved to death. When on his death bed- a pile of stalking in a animals cage- he makes clear his motivatings for his fasting, and reveals that his life was not as expert and elevated as it may fork out been perceived (though I dont think any one notwithstanding maybe the artist, in his denial, was under this illusion) but in event cursed.         Blessed is a fitting word for the fate of the paragon in Marquezs explanation. The affair in his character wanes, and his accommodations are upgraded, aft(prenominal) a push destroys the chicken coop he is allowed to live in the sh ed, the angel does not however appear to favour his new station any more then his previous, but from an objective horizon there is no doubt that his situation improved drastically. As this is happening throws begin to occur in the angel, both physical and emotionally as can be seen in the pick out          And yet he not only survived his worst winter, but seemed improved with the first rejoiced days. He remained motionless for some(prenominal) days in the out-of-the-way(prenominal)thest corner of the courtyards, where no one would see him, and at the commencement exercise of declination some big stiff feathers began to grow on his wings, the feathers of a scarecrow, which looked more like another misfortune of decrepitude, But he must keep back know the mind out for those changes, for he was quite careful that no one should notice them, that no one should hear the sea chanteys that he sometimes interpret under the stars (445). The angel in conclusio n recovers from his crash into Pelayos courtyard, and! is able fly off into the horizon, leaving Pelayo and Elisenda behind, who are on the all told ungrateful towards the old man and the successfulness he had brought with him.         The endings of the two stories leave two very different impressions on the reader, even though they are very similar. two stories end with to from from each one one one character achieving their purpose. The artist who at the beginning is smother not universe allowed to express to the entireest sense his art, is lastly able to fast himself to death, which bizarre as it may seems appears to have been his supreme goal. The angel, gets to be once again an angel, instead of just a man with a enormous set of wings, being that the most important prerequisite of an angel is flight and not only possessing wings. That being what it is the reader should be happy for both characters since each of them each achieved what they had set out to do. You are not of feed in happy for the hunger a rtist dying, we feel no-good that his population was so fated.         The reason for this feeling of despair towards Kafkas artist lies in the pass along of the story. That absolute denial of our true reputation ordain eventually be revealed as pathetic and wasteful. The message of the story is derived through the story and of a consequence of the characters. The audiences motivation for treating the artist badly, comes from their disgust towards a creature so gaga that he would turn the denial of the necessities of life, into a profession; this is alike the reason for their fascination. Their fascination is illustrated most eloquently in the spare-time activity excerpt. At one time the whole town took a rich interest in the hunger artist; from day to day of his fast the excitement mounted; everybody wanted to see him at least once a day; there were people who bought season tickets for the last fewer days and sit from first light till night in front of h is venial prohibit cage; even in the night time the! re were visiting hours, when the whole effect was heigh decenniumed by blowtorch flares; on fine days the cage was set out in the open air. And then it was the childrens special treat to see the hunger artist¦ [They] stood open mouthed, holding on to each others work force for greater security, marveling at him as he sit there in pallid black tights, with his ribs sticking out so prominently, not even on a scum handgrip but down among straw on the ground, sometimes bragging(a) a courteous nod, answering questions with a constrained smile, or perhaps stretching an arm through bars so that one might feel how thin it was (197) Just in the lead the artist dies he stops denying the true nature of the reason for his fasting, not that he is trying to achieve some flesh of artistic perfection, but that he is simply doom to do so by some cruel blemish in his character. This realization is evident by the look in his dimming look [as they] remained the firm though no longer proud prospect that he was still continuing to fast          defense lawyers is overly a main part of the theme of Marquezs story. merely in his story the public is the one denying the old man. This is once again shown through the actions of the characters. By treating the old man in such a poor way as they do, they are video display their disrespect too him as a supernatural being. The best reaction when you are encountered with something new and wondrous is not to jug it up and throw rocks at it, but to try and learn something about it and its purpose. The public in Marquezs story however has no desire to do this. Why they react this way is revealed by Elisendas feelings for the angel at the end of the story Elisenda shouted that it was rattling(a) living in that hell full of angels (444) and by her reaction when he flies away, She kept watching him even when she was through cutting the onions and she kept on watching until it was no longer possible for her to s ee him, because then he was no longer an annoyance in! her life but an notional transit on the horizon of the sea. (445) These lines basically sum up the thought that it is easier to live a normal life in a world were wondrous and magical things happen, though entirely interminably more boring. The connecting thread that links the two stories is the message that; although life can be made easier through the act of denial it cannot be made better, from Kafkas story there is the message that abnegation is a detrimental act upon a full life and Marquezs gives us the message that the denial of an irreparable change in our life causes us to take to the woods out on much of the beauty of life.         In Conclusion the two stories have a lot in common in terms of the actions interpreted against the main subjects, the eventually fate of their main characters, and the overall messages of the stories. By looking at these commonalities it is possible to discern the advantage and effectualness of fantasy as serious lit erary works and that relegating an replete(p) genre to be merely escapist is dismissing the largest purview of literature itself --the story. This is where fantasy exceeds, in the story, for many there is naught more worth reading about then an angel instruction to fly again. One may have thousands and mighty thoughts and crisp theories but if your medium is not an effective one, then you may as well stick to writing, top ten lists. Not to say that, it is impossible to write a story person will want to read without a few tartars in it, but dismissing out right that a dragon may not have anything intelligent to pass on is far too condemning. Another strong aspect of a fantasy story is its clarity, forces of good and evil and right and wrong, are normally very clear in a fantasy story, a fantasy story never becomes too symbolic, abstract, or figurative for someone to understand and it always makes clear its point. withdraw of the thousands of historic period of knowledge a nd experience one would miss out on if it one never t! ook the advice from an angel. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper