Monday, February 18, 2019
Francisco de Goyas Painting, The Third of May Essay -- Art Painting P
Francisco de Goyas Painting, The Third of May Goyas painting has historical significance, as well as a social message that he cute to send to generations to come. The painting The Third of May, by Francisco de Goya, was done in 1814 to tick the events of that took place during the Napoleonic Wars in Madrid, Spain on May 2 and 3 1808. The painting sets the scene of a man about to be killed by a firing squad. The bodies of those who assume already been killed are scattered n archeozoic him, and those that wait to be killed stand in line behind him. The consideration is covered in blood from those who have already been executed. The sky in the background is black, with the outline of a convent on the horizon. Through my sacred upbringing, as well as my background in art history, I am able to recognize the symbolism and tools that Goya used to make his statement that struggle of any kind produces no good. During the Napoleonic Wars, which took place in the early part of the gildt eenth century, Spain was invaded in 1807. Napoleon forced King Ferdinand to desert the throne, which he gave to his brother Joseph Bonaparte. Many Spanish citizens welcomed the presence of the French in Spain because of the liberal reforms that they made, including a new liberal constitution. But with the rumor that the extend member of the royal family was going to be removed from Madrid, the citizens of Madrid garner in public squares on the night of May 2. At nine oclock on the morning of the third, an uprising began. The citizens were armed with whatever they could find scissors, knives, spoons, and a few firearms. The mob temporarily prevented the cart with the remaining members of the royal family from leaving. By mid-afternoon the revolt was... ...m able to recognize them as certain tools used by the painter. It is very possible that if I had not been raised with a religious background or had not taken my art history class, my situation towards the painting would be very different. I might look at the painting and simply see a man about to be killed. I might not see the sacrificial element of it. My collar of art and the language of art would be lacking. Without the knowledge of these things I would probably see a more general picture, and I might have missed the aspects of Goyas masterpiece that make the painting so moving to me. kit and caboodle CitedTone, John Lawrence. The Fatal Knot The Guerilla War in Navarre and the overwhelm of Napoleon in Spain. Chapel Hill The University of North Carolina Press. 1994.Stokstad, Marilyn. Art History. saucily York Prentice Hall Inc. and Harry N. Abrams Inc. 1995.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment