Brave New World & “Bokanovsky’s Process”

The encroach in the midst of identity and communal identity element forms a central issue of Huxleys Brave New World. From the opening page of the novel, it is clear that Huxleys satiric utopia is back up by an all over-riding sense of civic authority and communal identity. The World verbalise celebrates its law and ethical paradigms by way of sloganism and its herald in a shield, the World produces motto, COMMUNITY, IDENTITY, STABILITY the three linguistic communication in rapid era suggest that the religious trinity of Father-Son-Holy-Ghost have been replaced by communal identification.The words seem to lead into one-an early(a), blurring their meanings together and suggesting a cause and effect that association allows for identity and stability participation in the World read, in fact, is identity and stability, (Huxley). As the novels first extended scene gets underway, the reader begins to enter the Utopian world and realizes that individuality, as recognized by c ontemporary real-world readers, is placed at a very low priority in the World evince. The mass-production of cars and other factory-built products has been applied to piece beings.Students attend a medical lecture on the Bokanovskys Process which generates mass-human production One egg, one embryo, one adult-normality. But a bokanovskified egg will bud, will proliferate, will divide. From eight to ninety-six buds, and all bud will grow into a perfectly formed embryo, and every embryo into a full-sized adult. Making ninety-six human beings grow where unaccompanied one grew before. Progress. (Huxley) From the very beginning of life in the World State, individuality is sacrificed in the name of community and in the name of mount.Huxleys satirical everting of the associations most commonly plug ind with human infants those of possibility and uniqueness and joy and subsumed to a lower place his Ford-factory-utopian abstraction of babies born in labs on conveyer belts. With this si ngle video and scene, Huxley sets up the central dichotomy of Brave New World, the conflict between individual liberty and self-actualization and communal of State-controlled power and State mandated happiness. Because Huxleys inclination is to critique the inhumanity of man, his vision of the complete eradication of individuality, by necessity, moldiness begin at birth. The coldly biological and assembly-line imagery establishes the depth and extensiveness of the conflict between individuality and community identification with urgency and immediacy. To except extend the comprehensiveness of the conflict, Huxley must demonstrate the loss of individual sexual activityual impulse and reproductive rights right along with his vision of the State egest assembly-line incubators.To completely subsume individuality, it is necessary to demystify eroticism and sexual acts sex is permitted freely in the World State although the kind of sex which is portrayed is cold and unfeeling and not at all what one would associate with human sexual impulse and romantic relationships as we now get along them. Because human sexual practice begins with self-image, Huxleys depiction of Leninas grooming and dressing routine plays a key role in showing how individuality is eradicated by the glance sponsored eroticism and fashion Lenina got out of the bath, toweled herself dry, took hold of a long on the table tube plugged into the wall A blast of warmed air dusted her with the finest talc powder. Eight different scents and eau-de-Cologne were laid on in little lights-out over the wash-basin. Because Lenina is later revealed to harbor serious radical thoughts regarding sexuality and love, the forgo scene of her bath and dressing serves to show how her inborn beauty and rude(a) sexuality have been obscured beneath synthetic-ism and communal homogeny, (Huxley).Leninas desired state of sexuality is in stark conflict with the professed sexual morals of the World State where p ast ideas about love, sex, and coquette ar vilified and seen as limitations to true human expression Family, monogamy, romance. Everywhere exclusiveness, a narrow channelling of impulse and energy in the new, progressive society, every one belongs to every one else, and there is no such issue as individual love or romance or monogamy.This inversion of sexual permissiveness like Huxleys conflation of assembly-lines and agreeries is an ironic technique which is meant to signal the perils of the breakdown of individuality and spontaneous chemistry between people. Huxley is saying, in effect, that is human individuality is sacrificed in the name of progress, then true progress will also have been sacrificed altogether. By demonstrating the grotesque nature of State sponsored Eros and State sponsored births, Huxley attacks the core- poses of humanity and sets his satirical sights on clarifying through and through aversion, the grave importance of individuation in society.In respo nse to the axiom that everyone belongs to everyone and thence has no personal will whatsoever, the young students in the lecture merely accept this axiom as truth The students nodded, emphatically agreeing with a educational activity which upwards of sixty-two thousand repetitions in the dark had made them accept, not merely as true, but as axiomatic, self-evident, utterly indisputable, and with his observation, Huxley makes it clear that the repress of individuality leads to a stifling of the mind, the imagination, and the will to discover truth as opposed to convenient but possibly corrupt or fictive explanations, (Huxley)If borth adn reproduction play a very large role in the fundamental elements of Huxleys satirical examination of the conflict between individuality adn community in Brave New World, the issue of death and more specifically of grieving play an equally important role in presenting a Utopian nightmare where the basic attributes and experiences of humanity have been paved over by homogenized experience and unemotional interpersonal relationships. A effectual example of this sub-theme in the novel is the scene between the Savage and the nurse in the hospital when the Savages mother lies dying.Normal grieving is looked at as a deep weakness in the social order of the World State Startled by the expression of distress on his pale face, she short broke off. Why, whatever is the matter? she asked. She was not accustomed to this kind of thing in visitors. (Not that there were many visitors anyhow or any crusade why there should be many visitors. ) Youre not feeling ill, are you? He shook his head. Shes my mother, he said in a scantily audible voice. The nurse glanced at him with startled, horrified eyes then pronto looked away. (Huxley).Huxleys novel is satirical in essence, but it is horrifying in experience and the strength of its visceral message about the urgency of preserving individuality is in many ways made acutely powerful by Hu xleys satirical inversion of primary modes of human experience including birth, love, sex, friendship, self-image, and even death. By demonstrating the horror of utopia through the loss of personal individuality, Huxley adroitly satirizes many of the conventions and technologies which have steadily risen as a threat in society to the holiness of the individual.