Social Learning Theory Psychology

In the field of Psychology, education theories are there to attempt to explain how people think and what factors ultimately influence their mien (ETR, 2007). There are various fictional characters of encyclopaedism theories which totally accommodate unalike concepts and approaches to distinguish an dread of hu small-arm carriage and thought (ETR, 2007). The societal learning speculation (SLT) is just unity of many theories which fall under the category of learning theories.The social learning hypothesis, which is also commonly know as social cognitive theory, is justified in the belief that gentleman carriage is determined by a triangular effect relationship between environmental influences, cognitive factors, and carriage (ETR, 2007). To have a proper understanding of the social learning theory, peerless needs to have been adequately briefed in the major contributors of the theory, a thorough description of what the theory entails, assumptions about the theory, an d the developmental process and practice which has previously and currently taken place.Accomplishment is socially judged by ill defined criteria so that one has to rely on others to find out how one is doing (Kearsley, 2008). This was stated by Albert Bandura, who is one of the devil major contributors to the social learning theory. Bandura was born the youthest and only male of vi siblings on December 4, 1925, in Mundare, Canada (Pajares, 2004). Fast-forwarding by means of his childhood, Bandura eventually gear up himself aid the University of British capital of South Carolina in Vancouver, Canada. His happening to fall into psychology was alone a fluke for him, for he was planning to get a mark in the biological sciences (Pajares, 2004).Bandura carpoo guide with peers to school who were all majors in design and pre-med, which entailed them to have early morning classes (Pajares, 2004). To fill his workload, Bandura had an open-morning spot to fill on his roster, which is where he fell into an entrance to psychology course (Pajares, 2004). He was directly intrigued, which led him on his path to becoming one of the great contributors to this field. In 1949, he graduated with the Bolo buns Award in psychology from the University of British Columbia (Pajares, 2004).His next task was to knock down graduate school, where he attend at the University of Iowa and received his Ph. D. in clinical psychology in 1952 (Pajares, 2004). starting already in 1953, Bandura found himself teaching at Stanford University where he came crosswise a well-educated student by the name of Richard Walters (Pajares, 2004). The two found themselves equally interested in the studies of explaining antisocial trespass in young males who came from whole few households in upper-class residential areas in comparison to demonstrating that six-fold opposing conditions may lead to styleal problems (Pajares, 2004).This particular study led Bandura and Walters to co-write a book, Adolescent Aggression, in 1959 (Pajares, 2004). From there, Bandura wrote a chain of numerous books dealings with the social learning theory. Later he became a found penis and elected President of the Ameri mickle Psychological Association in 1973 (Pajares, 2004). The secondly major contributor to the social learning theory came from a man by the name of Lev Vygotsky. Vygotsky was a Russian psychologist who was born in 1896 (Gallagher, 1999).Vygotsky was express to be a connoisseur of literature and philosophy (Gallagher, 1999). He be the University of Moscow, where he studied and received a degree in police (Gallagher, 1999). It was non until 1924 when Vygotsky became interested in psychology (Gallagher, 1999). He had written a paper, The Psychology of Art, in 1925 which he used primarily in his dissertation at the Moscow Institute of Psychology. Between the years of 1924-1934, before his re chief(prenominal)der due to Tuberculosis, is when all his psychology work was pract iced (Gallagher, 1999).In those 10 years of research and study of psychology, Vygotsky became an active follower of the sociocultural theory which suggests that development of a child relies on interaction with people and the tools or resources that the culture provides to help form their personal view of the world (Gallagher, 1999). The social learning theory (SLT), among others, is one of the most commonly used amazes currently. SLT is not a horribly complex model, for it is based around the interactions made from one another through observations, imitations, and modeling (Learning, 2008).Due to the fact that the SLT encompasses wariness, memory, and motivation, it is said to be a bridge for psychologists between behaviorists and cognitive learning (Learning, 2008). The SLT focuses on the expectation that people learn through observing other peoples behaviors, attitudes, and outcomes of those behaviors observe (Learning, 2008). The social learning theory has three basic princ iples which stimulate the breakdown of the theory very clear. The first principle is that people rotter learn through observation (Boeree, 2006). Bandura had conducted a well-known experiment known as the Bobo Doll Study (Boeree, 2006).In this study, Bandura had a set of dolls to which grown figures would interact with, in terms of gentle and/or aggressive behavior while children discover. Later, children were let into the room and were allowed to play with the same set of dolls that the adults had previously used. From data-based learning, the children themselves inflicted the same type of behavior that the adults previously did. The children who ascertained a gentle act toward the Bobo doll reacted in the same way to affiance a more calm and loving affect toward the doll.In contrast, the children who observed aggressive behavior toward the Bobo doll also copied the same behavior of aggression toward the doll (Boeree, 2006). Bandura came up with three basic models of empiric learning through conducting this study (Boeree, 2006). The first model is a live model. This involves an actual human individual who is acting out or demonstrating a particular behavior (Boeree, 2006). The second model is the verbal instructional approach. This involves giving the description and directions to acting out a certain behavior (Boeree, 2006). The third and last model is the symbolic model.This encompasses real of fictional characters. These characters are set to display behaviors in books, television, movies, or online media (Boeree, 2006). The second of the three basic principles is mental states are essential to learning (Boeree, 2006). In greater detail, this involves and contributes to intrinsic reinforcement. Bandura was the contributor to this that previously tell that external, environmental reinforcement was not the only factor to influence learning and behavior (Boeree, 2006). This is where the idea of intrinsic reinforcement comes into place.This type of re inforcement is internal, which throw out include feelings of satisfaction, pride, and sense of accomplishment (Boeree, 2006). This is how the term of social cognitive theory correlates directly with the social learning theory. These types of reinforcements emphasize the internal thoughts and cognitions to help join forces with theories of cognitive development (Boeree, 2006). The last of the three basic principles is that learning does not necessarily lead to change in behavior (Boeree, 2006). This means that observational learning does not define all observed behaviors not all behaviors must be and are acting on (Boeree, 2006).One can learn something through observation without demonstrating the bare-ass tuition attained. These three main principles paved the way for more of Banduras work in the SLT, and the introduction to specific modeling process. The modeling process consists of intravenous feeding primary move which lead to the development of understanding social learnin g theory. The first measuring is known by the word of Attention (Learning, 2008). This concept states that in disposition for an individual to learn, they have to be paying attention.It is possible for distractions of course, but anything that distracts one is going to ultimately have a negative effect on the observational learning taking place (Learning, 2008). A few examples of distractions could include macrocosm sleepy, groggy, sick, nervous, drugged, or even hyper in a sense can affect the learning process. All of those feelings can be competing factors with ones attention span. Likewise, for something that may be of interest to the sketch, full attention could be put into place and more dedication to observing and absorbing new information could happen (Learning, 2008).The second step is known as computer storage (Learning, 2008). Retention is known as the storing process of observational learning. The ability or lack of to store or remember information plays an important enjoyment in the learning process (Learning, 2008). Retention, just like attention, can be affected by many different factors as well. This is also where tomography and language come into play. One is able to store information in terms of verbal knowledge or imagery knowledge, depending on the subject and situation.Later, one is expected to bring up the previously observed information if retention was successful (Learning, 2008). No need to say that retaining information is a vital aspect to observational learning. Third on the list of move for the social learning model is Reproduction (Learning, 2008). This is where the consummateance of information retain is put into place. Once one has actually gone thorough attention and retained the proper information necessary, it is expected that one can perform the behavior initially learned (Learning, 2008).Of course, there are limitations to the ability of being able to perform certain tasks. For example, one can watch an Olympic go ld medalist do an entire gymnastic tumbling turning on the mat, but may not have the ability to pervert their body that particular way and be able to perform some of the stunts observed. This is why there is a leniency for the ability to perform tasks for the conclusion that further practice may be needed (Learning, 2008). With a crew of practice of the learned behavior and continuous observation of the behavior, the performance take may have improvement and further skill advancement.The final of the four proper steps is Motivation (Learning, 2008). In order for most observational learning to be successful to any state, motivation is crucial to replicate the modeled behavior (Learning, 2008). There are several factors that Bandura stated to be a vital part in the motivational factor of the observed behavior performance. Reinforcement and punishment are key concepts in motivation levels (Learning, 2008). Past reinforcement, such as a reward after a proper outtake of the behavio r, can motivate one to imitate the new observed behavior.In contrast, past punishment can be the same type of motivator. One who was punished previously for not conducting the observed behavior justly will make one want to conduct the new behavior successfully because they are aware of the consequences if not done properly (Learning, 2008). Also, promised reinforcements or punishments can do the same type of influence. A promised reinforcement, such as a treat, could make one strive to perform the task correctly. On the other hand, a promised punishment, such as a threat, can gain the same affect (Learning, 2008).