Comparative essay describing the ethics of Aristotle, Immanuel Kant, and Emmanuel Levinas Essay

Philosophers sound and encourage others to live according to the rules of practical wisdom. Aristotle, Immanuel Kant, and Emmanuel Levinas were three philosophers who sorted out various respectable approaches. They investigated complex human actions and theorized what is the ethical thing to do. For instance, Aristotle contemplated the exact of human life, Kant sight province and obligation from respect for the law, and Levinas examined whizzs responsibility to the Other. These unique points of view offer different answers regarding the try for the dandy.In addition to their differences, these philosophers are bound together by exchangeable ideas. For example, distributively of the philosophers believed in optimism they thought that entirely humans are naturally ethical. In addition, for each one of the philosophers believed in usance origin to be ethical. They emphasized the sentiment of living well and playing well by using thoroughgoing(a) habits and good charac ter to reach the good. Furthermore, they all believed in self actualization in other words, ethically being the best genius can be. They all thought an ethical person must be rational and responsible for their actions.They proposed that each person has a duty towards others and society. Aristotle lived during the B. C. earned run average and established the supposition of teleological ethics. This averages that ethics has a utilization or a reason. He stressed the fancy of doctrine of the mean maintaining balance in 1s actions. Additionally, he theorized the idea of developing virtuous habits to build good character as well as that happiness is the main goal of all human beings. He explained how compass ones potential by living well and acting well will ultimately lead to happiness.Moreover, he stated one should base ones actions on reason and he introduced the concept that reason controls desire. Immanuel Kant was a philosopher who lived the majority his life in the 1700s . He believed that an case-by-case should use graven image, freedom, and immortality to be able to pursue and attain the authoritative good. He also believed in deontological ethics, meaning it is ones obligation and duty to do what is right. Kant said that an individualistic must use intellect, free will, and reason to carry out this duty.He is similar to Aristotle because likewise, he believed that it is ideal for all people to act in an ethical manner by using reason. However, unlike Aristotle, Kant believed one must act ethically as an individual autonomy for the good of society.He said that one must use reason and free will to carry out ones duty and moral obligation to do good. He stressed the concept of not expecting to crap anything in return while performing ethical tasks even though one might not like it one should act ethically out of the goodness in ones heart. On the other hand, Aristotle believed one should act ethically as divorce of a community based on politic s. He also judge a benefit in return, contrary to Kant.Aristotle said that it is ideal to strike a reasonable means in ethics, and he expected to gain something like happiness for instance in return. Also, contrary to Aristotles theory, Kants theory proposes that it is not very possible to bring home the bacon the supreme good in ones lifetime. He suggested that humans must achieve this good in a life after death. This proves that their theories regarding how to achieve the supreme good differ considerably. Emmanuel Levinas was a Jewish philosopher of the 20th century. He observed that the West focused on the Unity of Beings, not the Hebraic infinity.The Hebrew Infinity focuses on uniqueness and singularity of things which gives them identity. Levinas based his ethics on this concept. Levinas believed one encounters the good or God in all individuals or in creation. He said one needs to recognize these traces, bear them, and act to them. He talked about the thrill of astonishme nt, which is a governance to feeling experience that touches one deeply. Additionally, he suggested that the face of the stranger (the Other) demands that you recognize it and show it hospitality. Thus, the face becomes ethical. He had this whole idea of promoting freedom rather than adjustment it.He believed that the face is a trace of God that refuses to use power. Instead, the face calls one to be responsible by humbly beckoning those that passes by. Kant also had similar theories as Levinas because both of them emphasized that God is necessary for a person to act ethically. In other words, they included God in their search for the good. Kant believed one cannot do this without God, whereas Levinas believed humans are motivated by God to do good. With the concept of the Other, Levinas suggested that humans have a responsibility to respond with caring and compassion.Similarly, Kant also believed in caring and compassion because he believed in the Universal Law if it is an act that is good for everyone, then it is good for an individual. It is patent that Aristotle, Immanuel Kant, and Emmanuel Levinas were three philosophers who sorted out various ethical approaches that aided them in their search for the good. Despite the fact that they have several similar theories, each philosopher has many unique theories that will continue to help future generations perk up to live ethically and to ultimately achieve the greater good.