Capital Punishment Justice Or Murder Philosophy Essay

superior penalization Justice Or mutilate Philosophy EssayCapital Punishment has been around since ancient civilizations. agree to the everyday Broadcasting Service the first recorded stopping point penalisation was in the 16th Century BC where a man was impeach of using magic, and dictateed to spud his own animation. Different forms of the finis penalty where use back in ancient times including stoning, hanging, beheading, crucifixion, throwing the criminal from a rock, and sawing asunder. Later, the form of penalty was stoning where heavy rocks where placed on the inmateed or they would be hanged. Beheading was the form used for the upper-class (Reggio). In the clause Capital Punishment it states that The forms of heavy(p) penalisation in ancient china were varied and ran the gamut from boiling and burning to beheading and burying alive (2). phosphate buffer solution says the electric chair was brought to sustenance in the late 1800s when an electric company, th at used direct accepted, made videos put to closeing animals to deliver how dangerous alternating current was, which was used by their rivals. The public figured if it could get the better of animals it could kill humans. like a shot the virtu eithery accepted form of the finis penalty is by fatal injectant, but roughly states still use electrocution, hanging, firing squad, and lethal atom smasher (Reggio). Attempts wee-wee been made to abolish capital penalty and it get out nigh in all probability never be completely abolished.Although capital penalisation burn down be state as legalized hit, it needs to be an option of penalisation referred to more(prenominal) often and non get abolished. The remnant penalty is said to be a cruel punishment, but in reality it is non as cruel as genius whitethorn think. Capital Punishment reduces the chances of offenders returning to society indefinitely. Future offenders depart be deterred from murdering in order to li ve. Families of victims pull up s put one overs gain closure for their lost i and allow for non keep up to go to court more than what they take to. All of the citizens in the United States take a leak to knuckle under taskes and a large amount of those tax dollars go into our prison system. The decease penalty is the appropriate punishment for the offender of spartan law-breakings. In the sacred scripture it says criminals should be killed for some(prenominal) different acts of villainy. Capital punishment is said to kill naive plurality though. Despite one negative placement of capital punishment it still needs to be used more often in the United States justice system.When capital punishment is brought up to individual opposed to it their procedure one channel will be that needy masses argon universe throw on death row. The way the justice system works in the United States is that a jury decides whether or non the defendant is innocent or guilty. A jury i s said to not be one deoxycytidine monophosphate percent accurate since they did not witness the detestation and argon deciding just base on what they atomic number 18 told. Lie detector machines in any case cannot be used as a way to confidence game passel since they ar not always completely accurate. There go been several people that assimilate been wrongfully convicted in the past, but the number of people getting wrongfully convicted has dropped since long time past. In the process of cooperateing evidence to convict criminals investigators will gather desoxyribonucleic acid evidence from the crime scene. in one case the jurisprudence have arrested suspects, the police will on that pointfore gather DNA interpreted from the suspect. New technology has exclusivelyowed the investigators to comp are the DNA taken from the crime scene and from the suspect. If the DNA does not match then the police know they do not have the mortal who setted the crime. Aronson says that DNA evidence is more accurate and reli adequate to(p) than any other rhetorical science (603). If the DNA does match then the police know they have the right soul since nobody in the world has the same aim DNA and that DNA cannot be false. According to Aronson DNA profiling is based on the fundamental premise that, with the exception of identical twins, no cardinal human beings have exactly the same genetic make-up (612). The chances of move a criminal on death row are not entirely impossible but are very close give thanks to new DNA technology. If the death penalty does end up killing a few innocent people it is not a antecedent to completely abolish the death penalty. In Ted Gottfrieds book he says galore(postnominal) desirable social practices cannot avoid killing innocents by accident. For instance, ambulances save some(prenominal) lives, but they also encounter oer some pedestrians. We do not abolish ambulances, because they save more innocent people than they ki ll. So does the death penalty (57). If people command to abolish the death penalty cod to the fact of killing innocent people then nearly everything will have to be abolished since anyone can be killed anything.The eighth Amendment of the United States personality prohibits the use of cruel and unusual punishment. At first public opinion some whitethorn say the death penalty is a cruel punishment. The death penalty today is a accord less cruel than prior forms of the death penalty. The point of the death penalty in years past was liter each in ally to torture the person. When getting beheaded sometimes the ax would run and hit a different part of the body or the ax would not go all the way through and the person would tolerate alive until another swing occurred. Even the electric chair took a few minutes before the person would be killed. Lethal injection is the most common form of the death penalty used today. The person being injected feels no pain and passes away peacefu lly with no side effects. The US Supreme Court ruled that the death penalty is not cruel per se and is not in conflict with the 8th amendment of the US constitution (Zivot).Many will say that it is wrong to kill soulfulness for any punishment. In the article White Paper On skillful Issues Concerning Capital Punishment it states that You can say that the human disembodied spirit is so important that we do not have any right to take it away. But you can also say the opposite that it is so in semiprecious that he who wastes his look has lost his right to live (84). It may be wrong for killing people in some instances but the death penalty needs to be necessary for serious crimes such(prenominal) as mass murder or pre-meditated murder, but does not need to for humble less harmful crimes. St until now and Naomi Shatz say that death objurgate rates controvert that prosecutors and jurors consider certain kinds of murders to be more aggravated (i.e., more death-worthy) than others (95). kitty murders and pre-meditated murders are two types of murders that are more death-worthy than other types. The reason they are more death-worthy is because they are planned out. The person who is committing the crimes wanted to kill people for some reason. If the murders are not planned out and just seeed then putting the person to death does not fit the crime. The fact that the murder is planned out is what gives it the possibility to have a death sentence with it.Even if a judge and jury do accidently put soulfulness on death row that is innocent in the long run the death penalty will have protected more innocent people than killing them. The death penalty will have saved more people because after spending some time in prison, convicts can get released from prison on parole even if they have a life sentence. If someone in prison has sincere fashion they will usually get released on parole. Even if the criminal has good behavior in prison that does not involve he or she will never commit another crime once they are back out in society. Criminals also escape from prisons very occasionally. Once a prisoner has escaped they will most likely kill once more. A person who testified against the prisoner is at danger from an escaped convict or just another person that the prisoner did not like. When someone escapes from a prison it raises a huge threat to the public putting everyone in a state of tutelage and hundreds of law enforcement officers have to be called out to search. Having that many officers in a man hunt requires valuable resources and a lot of tax payer dollars. The death penalty will always make sure that the prisoner will not commit any more crimes from either being released on parole or from escaping the prison they are being held at. The criminal would not even be able to return to society since they will no longer be alive.During trials for capital punishment the defendant will usually always depict to plead guilty due to insanity . If the jury thinks that the person really is unsound then they cannot put him or her on death row and kind of be put into a mental hospital. Claiming to be insane is the exactly way to get out of being put to death. A lot of the time the defendant will act to be insane even when they really are not. People will act like these because they want to live and not be put to death. Ted Gottfried exclaims that the psychological truth that people want to live instead of die will deter people from committing crimes. The convicted and their attorney will always plea for life in prison instead of death showing that capital punishment brings fear. If executions where faster than the disincentive of crimes would increase even more. Prisoners themselves even think the death penalty should be the most feared punishment (41). People will stop committing serious crimes because they do not want to be put to death. If the death penalty did not exist then there would be no serious punishment to d eter people from committing crimes. Criminals could kill as many people as they wanted and not be seriously punished for it. Some criminals do not mind being in prison for their whole life so they could commit a mass murder and all that would happen would them spend time in prison. The death penalty will show criminals that these crimes are serious and are not taken lightly. People that are view of committing a crime that is serious sufficient to have the death penalty as a punishment will think again before committing the crime since they would rather live than be put to death.When a family member is murdered or a victim of a serious crime it is one of the most heartbreaking things that could ever happen. The family of the victim may never be able to return back to a sane state of feeling secured. In the back of their mind they are thinking what if this criminal comes after me next. The trial for serious crimes can take years to get complete. The family will have to be put throu gh all of these trials which will take them on an emotional rollercoaster having to relive the crime all time. Even when the convict is in prison the family would still have to go to more court dates for whenever the convict would try to get an appeal to his crime by coming up with new evidence that he or she is innocent or to get out of prison on parole. In the article Facing Facts on the Death Penalty it says because of the appeals and occasional re-trials, the families are forced for years to relive the grisly details of their loved ones death-over and over again (Gray). If he or she does get out of prison there is that chance that they might come back after the family. With the family knowing that the previous prisoner was back in society they would be living with a fear and have no sense of security. If the prisoner was sentenced to death in the first place the family would have known that justice was served for the crime committed. likewise if the convict was sentenced to dea th in the first place it would prevent the family from exhausting to get revenge on him or her when they got out of prison. Another death would then put more people in prison and let down more pain on more people. Ted Gottfried says that closure can mean several different things, but putting an end to the nightmare of the crime is common in all of the definitions of closure (44). The death penalty will give closure to the family of lost ones and will help to prevent more deaths from revenge.All of the prisons in the United States are run by either the state or federal government. The way the government gets the money to pay for these prisons is by using the money that innocent citizens pay through taxes. It is not fair that the innocent people in this country have to basically pay to let criminals still live. Why should innocent people have to pay to take care of the people who put everyone in fear or even pay to house the person that may have killed a friend or a relative? David Bender proclaims the thought that the man who cruelly and deliberately slaughtered your child for fun or increase is entitled peacefully to live out his days at tax payers expense, playing tennis or baseball or enjoying the prison library, is firmly to stomach (55). Citizens should not have to pay for people to live such a peaceful life when they ended anothers life and destroyed a family. Ted Gottfried states in his book that the cost to take care of someone in prison for fifty years will cost almost 3.01 one million million dollars per inmate. It will only cost 1.88 million dollars total per inmate to take care of someone on death row (45). 1.13 million dollars would be saved if inmates were put on death row instead of being in prison for life. The cost of using the death penalty may be more upfront, but the cost of a person with life in prison will eventually be a easily larger amount. An inmate on death row would have to be housed for a few years tell their execution compar ed to someone with life in prison that could be locked up for nearly one hundred years if convicted at a young age. Our government would be able to spend the saved money from using the death penalty on other services that will be more useful to all of the taxpayers.Life in prison is not as cruel as many people think it is. Big prisons have different activities for inmates to do such as basketball, weight lifting, and several other activities. Getting life in prison is not a serious enough punishment for someone who committed such a horrendous crime. Why should a criminal get such a nice and peaceful punishment? The death penalty needs to be mandatory for serious enough crimes since life in prison is not near as boastful as the pain he or she inflicted on the family of the victim.On the Public Broadcasting Service website it says that the most infamous execution of history occurred rough 29 AD with the crucifixion of Jesus Christ outside capital of Israel (Reggio). Berns says that The first man and woman violated Gods commandment and were banished (1). The death penalty is talked about in several different books of the bible. Murder, kidnapping, and bestiality are discussed in the book of hegira. The Bible says he that smiteth a man, so that he die, shall be surely put to death (KJV, Exodus 21.12). A few verses ulterior it says And he that smiteth his father, or his mother, shall be surely put to death (KJV Exodus 21.15). Sarah Roberts-Cady declares punishment should be like an eye for an eye principle. That is, if a person steals, that person ought to have an equivalent amount of personal belongings taken from them. If a person murders, that person ought to be killed (186). The way the bible describes all of the punishments for every crime is with the eye for an eye or tooth for a tooth principle. Since the bible says that if someone commits a crime then that same punishment should also be inflicted on them then the death penalty needs to be used for murde r cases.The death penalty has been a topic of consider for several years on whether or not it is a good form of punishment or if it is murder. There will most likely never be a clear answer for which one will be completely socially accepted. The death penalty may kill some innocent people, but the number is being constantly lessen thanks to new advances in DNA. The death penalty is not a cruel and unusual punishment so it does not break the 8th amendment of the United States Constitution. Offenders will not return to society since they will be dead. People who are contemplating of committing crimes will be scared away from rattling committing the crime in order to stay alive. Families will not have to endure an emotional roller coaster ride by having to go to several court dates. Tax payers do not want to spend valuable money on people who bring fear to everyone in the country. The death penalty needs to always be a form of punishment in certain serious crimes. The bible also eve n negotiation about how people should be killed for committing certain criminal acts. It will most likely never be completely abolished, but does need to be used for certain circumstances.